one can be both free and economically secure while leading a totally meaningless and empty existence.
Since the Strict Father model is what holds Strict Father morality together, interference with the pursuit of self-interest threatens the foundations of the whole Strict Father moral framework-from the efficacy of moral strength to the validity of the moral order. The
Private enterprise and private life depend on nurturant morality, but so does freedom in American life. Freedom is what public resources provide-freedom in a way that we take for granted but that needs to be brought out in the open.
The self-righteous person’s superfluity of moral credit is the basis of his discourse. He presupposes his own moral values and his own righteousness as a condition of conversation. The effect of this is that anyone talking to a self-righteous person must either agree with his moral values and act equally self-righteous, or face being put in a morally inferior position in the discourse. This is what makes self-righteous people particularly infuriating to talk to. F
You can’t understand Twenty-first-Century Politics with an Eighteenth-Century Brain.
People who self-identify as “moderates
The Strict Father model takes as background the view that life is difficult and that the world is fundamentally dangerous.
An interesting advantage of restitution is that it does not place you in a moral dilemma with respect to the positive-action and debt-payment principles. You both perform a positive action and you pay your debt. A
Reich’s attempt to turn the conservatives’ model citizens into conservative demons was doomed to failure, and it fell flat immediately. The reason is clear. The status of successful corporations and the ultrarich as model citizens has become conventionalized-fixed in the conservative mind.
To them, social programs amount to coddling people-spoiling them.