Most people who are would each not be in love with their partner, if they did not have the kind of genitals they have.
I think men can really get in the way when you are trying to sort your life out and get on with it. Because they just take up so much space. I’m not under any illusions that I could have been where I am now in literary terms if I had been heterosexual. I really believe I would not be.
Heterosexuality is the enjoyment with fear, the pleasure with responsibility and the lust with concerns.
You’re into what you’re into, I’m into what I’m into. We don’t have to be into the same shit, and if you’re safe, sane, and happy, then go on and get you some.
If Lacan presumes that female homosexuality issues from a disappointed heterosexuality, as observation is said to show, could it not be equally clear to the observer that heterosexuality issues from a disappointed homosexuality?
Heterosexuality is the traditional way of expressing love and romance; the act of enjoyment between opposite sexes. It is not only for the purpose of enjoyment and pleasure, but also the human general survival. Whilst homosexuality is the freedom of enjoyment and pleasure from any means and ends.
Heterosexuality is not normal, it’s just common.