Every socialist is a disguised dictator.
Libertarians make no exceptions to the golden rule and provide no moral loophole, no double standard, for government.
My take on socialism is this: Socialism only seems to work when you don’t fully implement it, when you keep enough capitalism around to pay socialism’s bills, at least for a time. It’s the difference between milking the cow and killing it. Socialism has no theory of wealth creation; it’s just a destructive, envy-driven fantasy about redistributing it after something else (and somebody else) creates it first.
There is only a certain amount of wealth in the world, this thinking goes. Economics is a matter of acquiring and allocating, not creating. This was the view of the world’s smartest people, all top philosophers and not stupid people, for many thousands of years before the age of the enlightenment. It still is.
There is no difference between the principles, policies and practical results of socialism-and those of any historical or prehistorical tyranny. Socialism is merely democratic absolute monarchy-that is, a system of absolutism without a fixed head, open to seizure of power by all corners, by any ruthless climber, opportunist, adventurer, demagogue or thug.
Accepting necessary conflicts for the sake of improving the lives of children is the only fundamental moral crusade that matters.
No one wants their stuff stolen. No one wants their physical person harmed. If you understand the implications of those two truths, you can come to see the egregious moral and practical problems of a state-managed society.
They who employ force by proxy are as much responsible for that force as though they employed it themselves.
When the state itself is held to the same moral standards as everyone else, it dies. And that’s a wonderful thing.
No teacher has the right to cure a child of making noises on a drum. The only curing that should be practiced is the curing of unhappiness.